On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 at 14:16:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But I would never expect any kind of indexing or slicing to use "number of code points", which clearly requires O(n) decoding to determine it's position. That would be disastrous.

If the indexes put into the slice aren't by code-point, but people need to use proper helper functions to convert a code-point into an index, then we're basically back to where we are today.

Reply via email to