On 3/13/14, Daniele Vian <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you can do every changes you need / you want but you > should allow some time for people to update to new versions. No > problems if you want to set a function as "deprecated" (or even a > whole library) but please don't break compatibility all of a > sudden (and without warning even in the changelog).
As was said before this wasn't a planned API break, it was a regression. It will be fixed in the next point release, the fix for this has already been merged to the master branch. But why didn't you simply file a bug report instead of report to Walter?
