On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 18:09:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I had opened a pull to fix this, but it was never merged, due
to the back and forth "fiasco" of tagging said reserve. Since
I'm not fluent in D-runtime, I just let the issue drop.
Which PR?
-Steve
This first one was:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/553
It "simply" marked it as nothrow, pure, but was turned down, as
it called "throwing" code.
The second on is:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/632
It shuffles code around to "prove" the call is actually nothrow,
but IMO, is not worth it.
I believe in the first pull more than the second, which I believe
is more "proof". If you are willing to review, I can re-open the
first.
