On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 09:55:34 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Friday, 7 March 2014 at 19:06:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Have updated the DIP to include feedback from this thread :
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP54
It effectively means resorting back to both std.meta.pack and
std.meta.list as a compromise.
LGTM.
Hope to start working on it soon. Ironically, getting a D job
has stripped me of almost all time spent on side D tasks so
progress is very slow, sorry :(
Perhaps you can delegate some tasks to other members of the
community. I vaguely remember other members working on similar
modules to std.meta.*, too (John Colvin?).
Yes, I am using an almost identical layout to what is proposed in
this DIP.
The bulk of the work is done, but tests are thin on the ground. I
have a whole bunch of changes that haven't been commited and
pushed to github yet. I should be able to bring everything up to
date over the weekend.
Also, I noticed I haven't attributed some work I stole from other
peoples pull requests, so I'll fix that too.
There are a few enhancements to the language that would make a
big difference, as well as some bugs that are holding me back.
In particular, if there was such a thing as "symbol opDispatch"
that provided an alias to the symbol used after the . instead of
a string, UFCS for templates would be workable without horrible
leaky abstractions.
