Re: double.init is nan ..?

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 16:50:11 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Keep in mind that there are many NaNs, and double.nan is not 
the same as dounle init.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that! (double.init is a signaling nan 
while double.nan is not. There's a whole bunch of other nans 
possible in floating point too btw)

You're right. Looks like "is" always just compares the raw bits, 
which is good stuff when comparing with init.

So this passes:

assert(test is double.init);