Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:58:32 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley thusly wrote: > (Of course I find the whole property > syntax used for type introspection a bit silly, a half-thought-out > feature that's hard to parse, not easily extensible, and which doesn't > fit syntactically with the rest of the metaprogramming facilities.)
Maybe it requires a better grasp of the big picture to fully understand the nuances involved? After all, a feature like object.stringof is much easier to type than the other alternative __traits (get_string_presentation_of, object)
