On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 16:09:34 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 15:50:12 UTC, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace <[email protected]> wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem,
and should be addressed wherever it's found. If keeping sex
jokes...
Sex jokes do not imply sexism. They can form a part of it, but
I do not see evidence of that in this community at all.
I agree that this community doesn't seem unhealthy; and also
that, in general, sex jokes aren't necessarily a sign of sexism.
But I also think it's smart to establish a wide margin on
community practice. Correcting small, potentially harmful
behaviours sets a boundary, and avoids having to deal with
larger, certainly-harmful behaviours later on.
There are plenty of appropriate forums for sex jokes on the
Internet, we can surely live without them here.
Graham