On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 16:09:34 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 15:50:12 UTC, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace <[email protected]> wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.

I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.

The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem, and should be addressed wherever it's found. If keeping sex jokes...

Sex jokes do not imply sexism. They can form a part of it, but I do not see evidence of that in this community at all.

I agree that this community doesn't seem unhealthy; and also that, in general, sex jokes aren't necessarily a sign of sexism. But I also think it's smart to establish a wide margin on community practice. Correcting small, potentially harmful behaviours sets a boundary, and avoids having to deal with larger, certainly-harmful behaviours later on.

There are plenty of appropriate forums for sex jokes on the Internet, we can surely live without them here.

Graham

Reply via email to