On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 15:25:47 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Why isn't ParallelForEach implemented as Range, instead?
Because it can't be. It's not possible to present something as a range, so that that range's consumers would process that range in parallel. std.parallelism.parallel instead (ab)uses the opApply implementation mechanics to execute the foreach body in different threads.
