On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 16:07:33 UTC, Nikos wrote:
On Saturday, 15 February 2014 at 01:43:20 UTC, Anton wrote:
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 18:50:21 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
I have to
admit I departed D + QtD for Go + goqml since the former
needs effort
and the latter has got it. However I have conflict with this
as I much
prefer D over Go.
Yeah, I would hate to have to leave D for something like Go
because D doesn't have a decent OS X GUI library.
I'll take a look at the links everyone here has posted, thanks.
D is good language, but when I'm trying to write something more
complex like GtkD virtual data table view, I realize that I
can't do it in D. That is, if I want to learn D, I must learn C
first. Which is nonsense. So, D needs a good GUI library
written in D. And a good IDE too. VisualD is not good enough.
I agree that these improvmements would be good.
When you say "I can't do it in D" do you mean that you literally
need to use C itself, or do you just mean using the C GTK API
from D?
Bear in mind that D includes many concepts and a lot of syntax C.
In order to understand all of D, you will by definition end up
learning a lot of C-like things, even if you don't use them very
often in your real D code.
