Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > Ary Borenszweig wrote: >> Not if b[5] is a struct. Do I need to list evey possible syntax there >> it to get my point clear? :-( > > Yes, you actually need to. It was the point of my post.
Simple rule: rvalues cannot be modified (i.e. rvalues are implicitly const). No need to list all situations that generate rvalues. Or does that miss any cases? -- Rainer Deyke - [email protected]
