Re: Changing the behavior of the comma operator

[simendsjo]

On 03/26/2014 10:19 AM, Jason King wrote:

The proposed change would allow the code above, but not this:

for (x=1, y=2; x++, x < 10 && y < 20; y++) { ... }


Andrei

After the change in D this code would generate a warning/error?
If that's so then the "does the same as C code or fails to
compile" objective is still being met.

(x++, x < 10) would be a void rather than bool if I understand 
correctly, so this wouldn't compile.