On Wednesday, 26 March 2014 at 23:00:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/26/14, 3:13 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/26/2014 08:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't agree. It's much better to fix the little breaking
changes now,
and think about non-breaking improvements later. Because
later the
breaking changes will become less and less possible.
That later is already now.
So how come there exists this thread on breaking the comma
operator?
Because it's arguably worth it. -- Andrei
Because it has been agreed a long time a ago, but now we are
backpedaling because we can't break code as much as we used to.
That being said, I'm quite satisfied with Andrei's void return
value proposal.
