On Thursday, 27 March 2014 at 12:48:41 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
Your new fold (foldl? Should we have foldr as well?)
"fold" (from what I understood) is what you call "foldl". It was discussed to not introduce "foldr", as it's just "fold!(binaryReverseArgs!Fun)(range.retro);".
I'm not sure I was able to understand what the difference between "fold" and "foldl" is...
