On Thursday, 27 March 2014 at 16:33:53 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Also yes, but the general feeling around here, is that "string
functions" are a thing of the past, and should be replaced by
"real" lambda functions.
As such, even if "naryFun" works, it promotes the use of
something that is unpopular, and that some would like to see
disappear.
Don't forget this use case:
//Error
alias fun = (a) => a + 1;
//Ok
alias fun = unaryFun!(a => a + 1);
This is the main reason I think naryFun is a good idea.
