On 3/27/2014 1:59 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:53:35 -0400, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com>
wrote:
On 3/27/2014 9:12 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
If you initialized the next element in both constructor
As mentioned earlier, requiring this of a range constructor makes it
impossible to separate composition of a range with using it.
Not impossible. Use lazy initialization.
That still doesn't work, because then you could be calling front, and front
might fail if there's no input.
What is wrong with following the protocol? Why must we introduce all these
caveats for ranges, like streams not working, front that can fail, can't do C#
style LINQ, etc.? For what gain?
It only makes sense if you are using empty in your processing of the range.
I.e. follow the danged protocol and it works.
