Re: Yet a new properties proposal

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:33:29 -0400, Dimitar Kolev  
<dimitarrosenovko...@hotmail.com> wrote:

I'm not getting your example...

Different example:

class plane
{
    bool fly = false;
    bool fly()
    {
         if (fly == false) return false;

         // code for flying.
         // If it breaks for some reason
         return false;

         // else return that everything is okay.

         return true;
    }
}

class pilot
{
      if (myPlane.fly)
         myPlane.fly;
}

So this becomes:

class plane
{

Is this a property or a field?  If it's a property, where is the code for  
the property?  If it's a field, then.... um I have no idea what you are  
saying.  Mark all fields with @?
    bool @fly = false;

This is a function or a property?
    bool fly()
    {
         if (@fly == false) return false;

         // code for flying.
         // If it breaks for some reason
         return false;

         // else return that everything is okay.

         return true;
    }
}


class pilot
{
       plane @myPlane;


Huh?  What are you doing here, there is no return value...
       plane myPlane()
       {
              @myPlane = new plane();
       }

       bool fly()
       {
              if (@myPlane == null)
                    myPlane();


Does this use the field or the property of the plane?  Or is there a field?
              if (@mypl...@fly == false)
                  @mypl...@fly = true;

              @myPlane.fly;
       }
}

Still confused....

-Steve