language_fan wrote: > Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:57:33 +0200, downs thusly wrote: > >> As it stands, the claim on the homepage that it's easier to implement a >> D compiler than a C++ one is highly dubious. > > Isn't D simpler to implement than C++ because the template syntax goes > like !(foo) instead of <foo>?
Simpler to parse, mostly.
