On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 20:43:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:30:13 -0400, MrSmith
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 19:58:21 UTC, Jeroen Bollen wrote:
On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 19:56:38 UTC, MrSmith wrote:
On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 19:23:45 UTC, Jeroen Bollen wrote:
On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 19:13:31 UTC, Jeroen Bollen
wrote:
When I have myarray.length, why isn't that considered an
lvalue, and as a result, why cannot I get a pointer to it?
It seems kinda dumb, I understand it cannot be changed
manually, but surely you should be able to get a
const(type)* from it?
Well type would be ulong, so const(ulong)*
Array length is size_t which is uint on x86 and ulong on
x86_64.
Alright, but why can't you get a pointer to it?
I've tried, but no luck here
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/be526902ef4f
Cool! So, it is not a property function but actual size_t? How
would it grow then?
You had the elements backwards:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/8b5067aaf9d4
-Steve
