On Friday, 11 April 2014 at 15:54:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-04-11 15:53, monarch_dodra wrote:
Yeah. It'd say those wouldn't compile anyway, but I guess
something as
trivial as:
//----
class A
{...}
A a;
a.doit;
//----
Would compile for both languages, but give different results.
Fine.
Unless "doit" is non-virtual in both versions.
Why? The D version would just go from "object.Error Access
Violation" to "AssertError null this".
And in release, you'd still (highly probably) still get the
Access Violation.
