Re: Size_t on x86 is uint,on x64 is ulong,it's a good thing?

[Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d]

On 4/17/2014 12:36 PM,  FrankLike wrote:
  Size_t  on x86 is uint,on x64 is ulong,it's a good thing?
   I don't think is ok.
   it  creates many convert  thing,such as length is ulong ,must cast to
int or cast to uint. It will be waste of time ,I think.



If you want fixed-length, you use uint/ulong/etc. The whole point of 
size_t is for when you need the hardware's native data size.