Benji Smith wrote: > So the clusterfuck of unenforceable and useless conventions is already > here. Here's my suggestions: if you think putting parentheses on a > no-arg function is stupid, then it should be a syntax error for them to > exist. That wouldn't be my first choice, but it'd be a thousand times > better than the situation with optional parens.
+1 -- Rainer Deyke - [email protected]
