On 4/25/2014 7:28 AM, bearophile wrote:
Dicebot:
It is unacceptable to have code that fails with one compiler and works with
the other despite the shared frontend version. Such "enhanced" @nogc
attributes must be placed into compiler-specific attribute space and not as a
core language feature.
This problem was underlined during this thread far before the merging of the
@nogc implementation. Why have Walter & Andrei ignored the problem? What's the
point of creating a DIP if you ignore the problems found in its discussion?
What's the point of 338 comment posts if Walter goes on anyway with the original
idea? There are some problems in the D development method that must be
addressed.
The @nogc logic is entirely contained in the front end, and is not affected by
back end logic.
