"Walter Bright" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
Ok, I saw that, and replied to it earlier this thread.
Yes, but you seemed to miss the point.
Having a pragma to just add mangling doesn't deal with problems like:
namespace N { int foo(); }
namespace M { int foo(); }
foo(); // how to specify which one gets called?
I.e. only addressing name mangling does not scale. Need actual scopes,
too.
We have MODULES to deal with conflicts. We do NOT need to add a new type of
scope to D just for C++ namespaces.
You deal with conflicts the SAME WAY you do with normal symbols - put them
in different modules.
This is more powerful, because it doesn't force you to match the namespace
layout in your D code.
