Andrei Alexandrescu escribió:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Thanks. So it looks like get_property() and set_property() could fly.
How does that sound?
Not too much good. Among the simpler solutions there's the 'property'
attribute, that while not helping in reducing code (it makes code
longer!) solves most problems, while being simple. It's the minimal
solution that I think will work/fly.
We can't throw keywords at problems like they're getting out of style.
Hey! Let's introduce pure functions --> the new "pure" keyword was added.
Hey! Let's introduce functions that don't throw --> the new "nothrow"
keyword was added.
Hey! Let's introduce thread local storage --> "shared" and "__gshared"
keyword added.
Hey! Let's introduce... annotations and stop adding keywords for every
new feature.
