On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 04:32:37 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
The lesson from the Bottle/Flask/Tornado experience over the
last few years is that it is always better
to be working on the next version rather than just
stick to maintaining the current version.
Maybe, but in general, I write what I use, and right now I don't
have any significant new D web projects in the pipeline. I still
have a couple old ones going, but the new boss said no in
switching to D from Ruby (the rest of the team doesn't know it),
so the question now is: do I want to spend my nights writing
something I won't be using right now or doing something else?
for now, the answer is doing something else. That might change
eventually tho.
in the arena that Twisted used to be king; more vibe.d than
web.d.
I think the vibe.d folks are doing pretty cool work too.
Actually, my web.d could arguably be used with vibe.d; a vibe
backend for my cgi.d is a realistic possibility, and then web.d
is a pretty straight-forward add-on on top of that. In fact, it
might not even be very hard, I just haven't tried yet.
(And the other libs are already independent, I think Nick uses my
dom.d with vibe already.)
Though, my little httpd isn't awful so again, "works for me" is a
lot of inertia to overcome.
