Am Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:02:54 -0700 schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org>:
> > To summarize: It provides a function pointer for every unit test to > > druntime or user code. This is actually easy to do. Naming tests > > requires changes in the parser, but I guess that shouldn't be > > difficult either. > > That's fantastic, would you be willing to reconsider that work? Are you still interested in this? I guess we could build a std.test phobos module to completely replace the current unittest implementation, see: http://forum.dlang.org/post/ljtbch$lg6$1...@digitalmars.com This seems to be a better solution, especially considering extension possibilities.