On 5/2/14, 2:24 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 2 May 2014 at 09:05:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/1/2014 11:51 PM, deadalnix wrote:
First the original post I made on this forum :
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kluaojijixhwigouj...@forum.dlang.org#post-kluaojijixhwigoujeip:40forum.dlang.org
It's nearly the same as http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP29 except that DIP29
tries to use a library type to take the role of 'isolated' in your
proposal.
DIP29 is not safe, does not help to construct immutables, is not
inferred, do not provide aliasing infos for the optimizer, etc...
I think a more detailed comparison would do well here. My understanding
of DIP29 is quite at odds with these claims.
Andrei
