On 04/05/14 21:26, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 04/05/14 20:56, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
So I think it's probably safe to figure this is a uniform distribution unless
some expert chimes in and says otherwise.
Thanks for the help.
You're very welcome. Keep me posted on how things go with your implementation!
:-)
I should also be thanking you -- this reminded me that I needed to make some key
changes to my std.random2 proposal, including this stricter isUniformRNG template:
https://github.com/WebDrake/std.random2/commit/a071d8d182eb28516198bb292a0b45f86f4425fe
How does this look to people? And would there be interest in seeing this land
in the existing std.random ... ?
