On 2014-05-08 14:56, Dicebot wrote:
You don't need artificial pseudo syntax for that.
assert!("==") + named tests is good enough to get the context and for
detailed investigation you need file and line number anyway. Stuff like
RSpec is extreme opposite of KISS.
RSpec uses a syntax that makes it easier to read a test. To understand
what it actually tests. I mean, what the h*ll does this unit test tests:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/blob/master/std/numeric.d#L995
I'm mostly interested in the describe/it functionality, not the fancy
asserts, although I don't mind them either.
@describe("foo")
{
@it("should do something useful") unittest
{
}
}
Is not so much different from what you suggested with named unit tests.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
