On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 02:40:29 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 15:28:28 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
If would be nice if Don could elaborate on his comment in bug
#6498 (https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6498#c1)
What is really needed is the ability to update variables in
place.
Currently every mutation allocates a new value.
IMO the underlying problem is that CTFE operates on full AST
nodes.
To solve this, we either need a separate data representation for
CTFE or even better work on JITing.
JITing can wait. Just an abstract interpreter would be a huge
improvement on what we have currently. As long as it is designed
to allow JITing in the future.