On 06/05/2014 08:17 PM, deadalnix wrote:
@safe is fundamentally broken.
What's the "fundamental" problem? The construct seems perfectly fit to specify memory safety in at least the following context:
void main()@safe{}
:o)
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:37:11 -0700
On 06/05/2014 08:17 PM, deadalnix wrote:
@safe is fundamentally broken.
What's the "fundamental" problem? The construct seems perfectly fit to specify memory safety in at least the following context:
void main()@safe{}
:o)