On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 15:00:20 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I often find myself wanting to write this:
foreach(; 0..n) {}
In the case that I just want to do something n times and I don't
actually care about the loop counter, but this doesn't compile.
You can do this:
for(;;) {}
If 'for' lets you omit any of the loop terms, surely it makes
sense
that foreach would allow you to omit the first term as well?
I see no need to declare a superfluous loop counter when it is
unused.
Over 50 comments about minor syntax issue that makes no practical
difference. D community never changes :P
