Re: Time to rename "D" to "@D" !?
Chris Nicholson-Sauls via Digitalmars-d Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:41:33 -0700
Funny enough two of the attributes you mentioned (pure and
nothrow) don't have an @ on them. Maybe I'm strange, but I don't
see any problem with the @, and would actually like to see some
of the other attributes (including pure and nothrow) adopt them,
for consistancy and to free up names. Surely you don't think
"safe" should be a keyword? Or "trusted" or "system"?
- Time to rename "D" to &q... John via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "D&qu... Joakim via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "... Nordlöw
- Re: Time to rename "D&qu... Martin Krejcirik via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "D&qu... Chris Nicholson-Sauls via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "... Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename &q... Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to renam... Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "D&qu... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "D&qu... Mason McGill via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "D&qu... Grogan via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename "... Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to rename &q... Grogan via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to renam... Grogan via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Time to ... Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
