On 06/27/2014 01:47 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/26/14, 4:16 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
...
You can say "out of scope" or "not a priority" or "this should be
realized in third-party tool support" but not "it is impossible".
I also seem to reckon Walter is in the other extreme (he asserts it
can't be done at all, period).
I don't think it makes sense to imply that I am defending an extreme
position. I wasn't discussing design choices, truth is not a continuum
and I was just objecting to the line of reasoning that went like
"undecidability of the halting problem implies that formal reasoning is
pointless.", which is clearly untrue.
My understanding is that it can be done
but only with annotations or whole program analysis.
...
Any way it is done, it doesn't come for free.