On 06/29/2014 02:40 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/28/2014 3:33 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
...
So D should perhaps make a breaking change and have types int32, int64,
float32, float64, float80, and get away from the vagaries of bizarre
type relationships with hardware?

D's spec says that the 'real' type is the max size supported by the FP
hardware. How is this wrong?


It is hardware-dependent.

Reply via email to