On Tuesday, 1 July 2014 at 08:34:30 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 30 June 2014 at 21:23:59 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
My opinion is that the redesign preserves the spirit of the
current logo while fitting in well with the flatter look. I
think someone who sees the one logo will recognize the other
in it (unlike some of the recent proposed logos).
On Tuesday, 1 July 2014 at 06:42:49 UTC, w0rp wrote:
The logo is a placeholder I made with no graphic design
experience. The old logo is a bit too fat and round to fit
with the new design, so I'd like something which is obviously
still the same brand, but looks a bit flatter.
No! You must use the original D logo, this is not up for
debate. I will fight this until the end. You cannot mess about
with the brand! We must start to approach these things in a
professional and respectful manner.
The original D logo (and colours) must be used.
Doing logo restyling together with web site update is not unheard
of. Why do you see this a big deal? As long as it is recognizable
and not fundamentally different of course. Having logo that
simply does not fit into new design is worse.
