On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 02:32:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/1/2014 3:02 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
I'm not taking it lightly. The big issue I see with the
current state is that D
simply doesn't have a consistent brand at this point, and
never had (D Man,
anyone?). Frantically clinging to the current bits and pieces
doesn't help us at
all, and neither do alarmist and inflammatory sweeping blows
directed at a
honest (and only partially related) volunteer effort.
The only thing that we have that is consistent is the current D
logo. I do not understand the rationale for changing it.
That do not make any sense. Element are consistent as a ensemble.
Each element taken separately will be consistent with itself.
There's so much that can be done to improve the website, I'm
reluctant to put time and energy into redesigning the logo.
Someone did. It is agreed by most that it is better looking and
more usable than what we currently have.
