On Sunday, 6 July 2014 at 04:20:21 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
That's not 'merely holding a pointer' and it applies to class references just as much.
Eh?This is genius, you've just "proven" that references are as unsafe as pointers, and people who spent much time and efforts designing the whole reference semantics in order to replace pointers and achieve language and memory safety, are stupid. Well done.
This is just random nonsense.
If you say so...
