On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 12:20:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Give it a rest. If 'void foo(int, float)' is ok so should
'catch (E)'
be. We can change the spec if we have to, it's easier than
breaking code.
Huh? Brian explicitly remarked earlier that
Implementing the spec, i.e. requiring exceptions to be named,
would break far more code than what I propose,
and the DIP doesn't contain anything to that effect either
I'm a bit puzzled as to what the controversy is supposed to be
about.
David
