On 7/9/14, 11:59 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 19:50:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
8. NotNull!T type
For those that want a non-nullable reference type. This should be
doable
as a library type.
No.
Rationale?
Please, we've gone through this again and again and again and again.
Yes, the arguments come and go by in forum discussions. To avoid this we
need a well-written DIP that has a section illustrating the
insufficiencies of library solutions, and then proposes the few needed
additions to the language that make the thing work properly. Other
language communities have done this with good results.
Andrei
