Am 10.07.2014 21:57, schrieb deadalnix:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 11:21:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Adrian:
As for your second question (i.e. how good the GC needs to be for
me), I would probably be satisfied with a GC that matches the Java one
This will not happen even in one hundred years. So if that's what you
want, you will never be satisfied by D GC.
Actually, I think we can do better than Java, because we have
type qualifiers and less indirection. That isn't unseen: OCaml's
GC is more performant than Java's. We certainly do not have the
resources java has, but we have a language that is way more GC
friendly.
I agree, given the research OS implemented in GC enabled systems languages.
Sadly I cannot speak for more than Oberon and AOS as experience.
--
Paulo
