-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 bearophile wrote: > Walter Bright: > > I like this general proposal, it sounds like something that can improve D a > little. There are many other things that have to be improved in D, but baby > steps are enough to go somewhere :-) > >> Slices will retain the old: >> T[] slice; >> syntax. Resizeable arrays will be declared as: >> T[new] array; > > Such syntaxes have to be chosen wisely. I don't fully understand that syntax. > And maybe I don't fully like it. > I think the default (simpler) syntax has to be the most flexible and safer > construct, that is resizable arrays. Slices can be seen as an optimization, > so they can have a bit longer syntax. >
<snip> Ya, not a nice syntax. how about T[!static] ?! ;) - -- My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness. http://www.ssTk.co.uk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFKgHaiT9LetA9XoXwRAoBDAJ9WAHlAjkW7TXRUWqCz80N8m4WbwACfTCfP 9MnZfV5pifUKwNC3c1HgySM= =J6pq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
