On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 17:02:59 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
The stated goal of this log library is to provide a base with
common useful
functionality, in a way that can be extended to fit more
complicated use
cases. I'd argue that what you are talking about fits into the
'more
complicated' - the log API should definitely allow this, in a
way that it
can be plugged in without log using code having to change, but
I don't
believe the functionality needs to be in the base library (at
this time).
Getting things changed is more difficult than getting it right
from the start. As far as I am concerned it is crucial in the
sense that if it does not support severity levels and easy
integration with existing logging services then I probably won't
use it.
