On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 07:31:39 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
+1 for not having the conditional log

Not so sure about that. -- Andrei

I agree that the conditional could be useful. But I think that the current API definition where we already have some strange letter combinations ('l', 'c', 'f') is an one-way street, that throws away some good possibilities to extend it later. Should we keep adding cryptic letters? That is the reason why I think it is better to let out the conditional log for now.

errorIf - looks D-like
errorc  - is at most C-like

The argument that writef/-ln also contain some cryptic letters have historical reasons and should not motivate us to add some more.

I wouldn't call them cryptic, they are in fact very easy.

l = LogLevel
c = conditional
f = printf

what is so difficult about them. Sure errorIf looks easier, but what
about errorLogLevelIfPrintfFormat in comparison to errorlcf

Reply via email to