On 7/8/14, 2:31 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP65
tldr: There are parser and specification bugs and I want to fix them. It
will break some poorly-written code, but I think I can automate the
upgrade process.
I vote we reject this DIP. It has clear appeal but there's also the
issue with putting currently correct code on a deprecation path, with no
obvious win in quality.
I think Walter's fix eliminates the problem during the semantic pass
even though there's a grammar ambiguity. It's a judgment call, and by
definition someone has to make it.
Andrei
