On 24/07/14 17:11, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I didn't specify, and I don't think this code requires that I do.
T will resolve this situation naturally.
Is it 'template T(X)'? Obviously the type.
Is it 'template T(alias X)'? this could be the type or the template, but
since the template is more inclusive, it should be that. Within T's
definition, if T is passed as the template, then the opportunity is
retained to go either way as is necessary when the context becomes explicit.
I actually think it works quite elegantly. What have I missed?
I'm pretty sure I've asked the same question as you did. I also got
similar replays. To me it's quite simple. In every case it will be the
template, as it is now. Except when called with arguments as a constructor.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
