Re: WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/25/2014 1:02 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
3. If opCmp is defined but no opEquals, lhs == rhs will be lowered to
lhs.opCmp(rhs) == 0

This is the sticking point. opCmp and opEquals are separate on purpose, see 
Andrei's posts.