On 25/07/14 12:09, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The _only_ code that would break would be code that's _already_ broken - code that defines opCmp in a way that's inconsistent with the default opEquals and then doesn't define opEquals. I see no reason to worry about making sure that we don't break code that's already broken.
I see no reason why I should define opEquals when opCmp was used for AA keys. You keep ignoring that argument.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
