So perhaps we should implement `bool opEquals = default;`.
No new syntax.
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEquals wo... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEqual... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEqual... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: opCmp and opEquals woe... Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
- Re: opCmp and opEquals... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opEqual... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Daniel Gibson via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: WAT: opCmp and opE... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
