On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:27:57PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 7/25/2014 11:05 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > >In the meantime, I think much of the confusion comes from the current > >documentation not be adequately clear about the reasoning behind > >having opCmp and opEquals, so it's too easy to get the wrong > >impression that defining opCmp is enough to make things work, or to > >have a fuzzy inaccurate understanding for how opCmp interacts with > >opEquals, and when/why to use each. I think a documentation PR is in > >order. > > I welcome a PR from you on this!
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/620 T -- Give a man a fish, and he eats once. Teach a man to fish, and he will sit forever.
